Video review — tap to play
Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap… and Others Don’t
What separates a good company from one that achieves lasting greatness? In Good to Great, Jim Collins and his research team examine companies that made the leap from solid performance to sustained excellence, comparing them with carefully selected businesses that failed to do so. Drawing on years of research and thousands of pages of data and interviews, Collins identifies key principles behind that transformation, including Level 5 Leadership, disciplined culture, the Hedgehog Concept, technology as an accelerator, and the Flywheel Effect. The result is a detailed exploration of what drives enduring organizational performance.
- Release Date
- 2001
- Length
- 300 pages
- Publisher
- HarperBusiness
We may earn a commission if you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.
Our Review
About the book
Jim Collins and his research team studied companies that made a sustained leap from average to exceptional performance and compared them with peers that did not. The book introduces concepts such as Level 5 leadership, the Hedgehog Concept and the flywheel.
Our review
Collins wrote a landmark of business writing whose vocabulary has outlived several of the companies it celebrated.
Collins brought a researcher’s discipline to a genre full of anecdote, and it shows. The matched-pair comparisons give the book a satisfying structure, and his central ideas, humble but fiercely determined leaders, getting the right people on the bus, confronting brutal facts, are memorable and useful well beyond the corporate world. His prose is lively, and the case studies read almost like detective stories, with clues building toward a conclusion.
Time has been unkind to the evidence. Several of the featured great companies stumbled or collapsed after publication, and critics have pointed out survivorship bias and the risk of fitting stories to outcomes after the fact. That does not erase the value of the concepts, but it does weaken the claim that they were proven. Read it as a source of durable principles and good questions rather than a scientific formula for success.
What we loved
- Memorable, widely applicable leadership concepts
- Engaging case-study structure with a clear argument
- Useful for nonprofits and teams, not just corporations
Keep in mind
- Several showcased companies later declined or failed
- Methodology vulnerable to survivorship and hindsight bias
Read it if you like
Readers of Built to Last, The Innovator’s Dilemma by Clayton Christensen, or Drive by Daniel Pink.
The verdict
Influential and still useful as a set of ideas, but its scientific promise has not aged well.
